The Democratic party apparently has a death wish. They have chosen Obama over Hillary Clinton despite the unsavory associations and obvious anti-American radicalism that has emerged from his church, which he has only recently left. Lets face it, when Obama introduced himself as a post-racial candidate, someone who was supposedly new and fresh and proposed "change" nobody knew about Reverend Wright, Father Pflager. His image has taken a hit. People now see him as just another black candidate with left wing views who has exhibted poor judgement in selecting his friends and associates, not to mention his character.
What I am still trying to figure out and accept is that my former Party, The Democratic Party has decided to stick with him even after these vile associations were revealed. Why have they stuck with him and has cast out Hillary Clinton? One has to ask this question: Does The Democratic Party hate Bill and Hillary Clinton so much that they are willing to chance the White House? Are they willing to lose rather than make Hillary President. Apparently that is the case. Obama has not condemned the Trinity, Reverend Wright, or Father Pflager. Neither did the Democratic Party. Clearly, the Democratic Party must be desensitized about what has been going on at Trinity for the Past 20 years while Obama and Michelle were members. Why else would Democrats have given them a pass? Apparently it was not that important to disqualify him as the Democratic Nominee. Somehow, I think a lot of Americans might have a different view.
Only this past Sunday did Howard Dean spoke about the sexism in the media. He did not specifically condemn sexism against Hillary. I'm wondering; where was Howard Dean and the other members of the Party when Hillary was being attacked and ridiculed? Now we are at the end of the process and suddenly it is wrong? maybe the outcome would have been different if the Party had spoken out. But we couldn't have anything that might derail Obama, could we?
The irony is that now everyone wants Hillary to "unite the party" so they can crown Obama. These people stabbed her in the back, and yet, they are bitching about her not endorsing Obama the same night they "gave" him the nomination. These people are like dog naam dog. They will turn on and devour their own in a New York minute (pun intended). They have forced her to concede, even as Obama's supporters are disrespecting her, campaigning against her as his VP, whether she wants to be or not. You do not endear yourself to someone when you treat her like crap. Especially if she has a 18 million strong coalition and you "need" her to win. She has nothing else to lose, remember, since her "dream" was "taken away" and "given" to him, so why should she be magnanimous?
What I do not want to see is Hillary running around the country campaigning with him, acting as if she is "happy" to be doing so. And...Bill Clinton SHOULD NOT camapign for Obama because he was out there minimizing his Presidency.
This talk about party unity is a bunch of bull. The Democratic Party claerly does not want any part of the Clintons and the "blue collar" voters because they now think they have the youth vote. I would caution them that this group has consistently shown themselves to be unreliable voters time after time.
They talk about OPbama expanding the Party. What about the 18 million voters Hillary Clinton brought in? That is not irelevant by any means. They are women, Hispanics, and blue collar voters... a much more relaible voting block.
Thursday, June 5, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment